Jolly Roger Charter

Draft. JRCv1 is a working conformance standard, not a software licence, and nothing here is certified. Launch status.

Raise the flag

Adopt without asking

No application, fee or approval. Publish your evidence and say which level you're at.

Three honest levels

LevelWhat you can claimWhat it is not
ExploringYou're interested and you've written down your gaps.Any conformance claim at all
Implemented (self-reported)You've published evidence links for the pillars you meet.Independent certification
Independently reproducedAn outside reviewer has reproduced your claim and published their method and results.A permanent badge. Claims are tied to a version and a date.

Partial adoption is normal. "4 of 6 pillars evidenced, help wanted on the other two" is a good claim to make.

Self-assessment checklist

  1. Code and rights: a real licence or dedication for your original code, plus a dependency inventory with licences.
  2. Development: specs, decisions, agent and tool versions where known, tests, and build instructions a stranger can follow.
  3. Data: a working export and import, documented data boundaries, and AT Protocol where it applies, or an honest note on why it doesn't yet.
  4. Operations: a deployment and rollback procedure with no secret steps, backup and restore, and a path to another host.
  5. Economics: dated, sourced costs. Billed, estimated and donated costs are kept separate, and unknowns are marked unknown.
  6. Governance: open proposals, documented decisions, and a succession plan that doesn't run through one person.

The full criteria are in the conformance section. For a machine-readable record, start from templates/open-infrastructure.example.yaml. It's an illustrative template, not a working integration.

Tell people

Raising the flag doesn't need our permission. If you'd like a link from here, open an issue with your evidence. Listing a project here doesn't mean we've audited it.

Adopters listed: 0 We won't list adopters who haven't asked to be listed.